Monday 28 October 2019

bash - Are my Linux symbolic links acting correctly?


I've been using Linux on and off for the last 15 years and today I came across something in bash that surprised me.


Setup the following directory structure:


$ cd /tmp
$ mkdir /tmp/symlinktest
$ mkdir /tmp/symlinktest/dir
$ mkdir /tmp/symlinktarget

Now create two sym links in symlinktest pointing to symlinktarget:


$ cd /tmp/symlinktest
$ ln -s ../symlinktarget Asym
$ ln -s ../symlinktarget Bsym

Now, in bash, the following tab completion does strange things. Type the following:


$ cd dir
$ cd ../A[TAB]

Pressing the tab key above completes the line to:


$ cd ../Asym/

as I expected. Now press enter to change into Asym and type:


$ cd ../B[TAB]

This time pressing the tab key completes the link to:


$ cd ../Bsym[space]

Note that there is now a space after the Bsym and there is no trailing slash.


My question is, why when changing from the physical directory "dir" to Asym it recognises that Asym is a link to a directory, but when changing from one sym link to another, it doesn't recognise that it's a link to a directory?


In addition, if I try to create a new file within Asym, I get an error message:


$ cd /tmp/symlinktest/Asym
$ cat hello > ../Bsym/file.txt
-bash: ../Bsym/file.txt: No such file or directory

I always thought that symlinks were mostly transparent except to programs that need to manipulate them. Is this normal behaviour?


Many thanks,


Andy



Answer



bash's cd builtin does a bit of magic with ...


When you do:


cd ../Bsym

It looks at $PWD, removes the last component, adds the Bsym component. This is what cd and cd -L do, as opposed to cd -P. Also see pwd -L and pwd -P.


When you do:


cat hello > ../Bsym/file.txt

This magic doesn't take place. $PWD isn't used, /proc/self/cwd is used instead. The cwd is an inode, and .. is just the parent inode, which happens to be /tmp.


No comments:

Post a Comment

How can I VLOOKUP in multiple Excel documents?

I am trying to VLOOKUP reference data with around 400 seperate Excel files. Is it possible to do this in a quick way rather than doing it m...